Most inventions are unpatentable in the form submitted — find out before you spend $5K on filing fees

Before you spend $5K on filing fees, find out if it's even patentable.

AI patent attorney analyzes your invention against 35 USC §101/§102/§103/§112. You get: novelty score, patentability score, prior art that an examiner would cite, recommended claims, and a brutally honest red-flag list.

Run my search — from $69→How it works

Most "inventions" are unpatentable in the form submitted. We tell you before you spend $5K finding out.

Part of the AEQUARA Suite · 46 AI tools · Not legal/financial advice

$5,000

Average USPTO filing + attorney fee for a patent application

$149

Cost of a Pro pre-filing novelty search vs. finding out at $5K

60%

Of DIY patent applications rejected for §103 obviousness issues a search would catch

What you get vs $500-1000 attorney pre-filing search

⚖️

Honest patentability

0-100 score against §101, §102, §103, §112. Most attorneys won't say "this isn't patentable" because they want the filing fee. AI doesn't care.

🔍

Prior art an examiner would cite

Up to 5 similar patents with patent numbers, what each covers, how yours differs, and the risk level for each.

📜

Recommended claim structure

Independent claim 1 + dependent claims 2-5 designed to maximize likelihood of allowance. Strategic breadth, not the maximalist mistake DIY filers make.

🚩

Red flags called out

Alice §101 risk for software/business methods, on-sale bar, enablement gaps, prior disclosures. The traps DIY filers walk into.

One-time pricing. Save $4,800+ vs. filing without a pre-search.

Starter

$69

Patentability score and prior art candidates — the core due diligence before any filing decision.

Full novelty + patentability analysis
5 prior-art candidates
Red flags

Start with Starter

Full Patent Search

$149

Complete pre-filing analysis: patentability score, prior art, recommended claim structure, filing strategy, and red flags.

Full novelty + patentability analysis
5 prior-art candidates
Recommended claim structure
Filing strategy
Red flags
PDF report
vs $500–$1,000 attorney search

Get Pro Access

3-Search Bundle

$349

3 full patent searches — same depth as Pro. Save $98 vs. three singles.

Everything in Full Patent Search
3 searches to use any time
Ideal for portfolios or multiple inventions

Get Bundle

Unlimited Annual

$990/year

Unlimited patent searches all year — ideal for inventors or IP-active teams.

Everything in Full Patent Search
Unlimited searches all year
Priority support

Get Annual Access

Frequently asked

Is this legal advice?

No. This is research and analysis only. Use the report to decide whether to engage a registered patent attorney for actual prosecution. We are not a law firm.

How accurate is the prior-art search?

Comparable to a $500-1000 attorney pre-filing search. AI sees more breadth (millions of patents in training data) but misses the most recent filings (last 6 months, since publication lags). For high-stakes filings, supplement with USPTO/Google Patents searches.

Will this hold up in prosecution?

The recommended claims are professional-quality starting points but should be reviewed by a registered patent attorney before filing. The novelty analysis catches most §103 obviousness issues. We're a filter, not a replacement.

Is Patent Search worth $149?

USPTO filing fees alone are $800–$1,600. Attorney fees add $3,000–$5,000. At $149, you validate patentability before committing that capital. One prevented filing saves you $4,800–$6,600.

What if I don't get results?

If the search does not produce a patentability score, prior art candidates, and a claim structure recommendation, email us within 7 days for a full refund.